TBers,

The issue of classroom utilization and scheduling was discussed at the
most recent Council of Chairs. Bill Grau was invited to the meeting and
he provided invaluable insights into the scheduling process.  

It is apparent the utilization (and availability) of classroom resources
is driven by several factors.  The most influential seems to be
"faculty" and student preferences for the 10-2 time slots, especially
T-Th.  My guess would be that the preference for these times isn't
driven by teaching needs.  I believe Bill said that any class scheduled
before 10 and after 2 could pretty much choose the classroom they
wanted.  It was also pointed out that it is impossible to argue
(legitimately) for increased academic space when existing space is
significantly underutilized.

I would suggest that any discussion about class scheduling and classroom
assignments include Bill.

Bill

William R. Proulx, Ph.D., R.D.
Chair and Associate Professor
Department of Human Ecology
SUNY College at Oneonta
Oneonta, New York 13820
607-436-2705


-----Original Message-----
From: Teaching Breakfast List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Achim Koeddermann
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 9:42 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: REGlobalized Teaching Breakfast

Thank's, Bob,
dear all:
what do you think about a debate on teaching times and patterns? With
Fitzelle renovation, the classroom availablility will drive a decision -
but it SHOULD be driven by academic, TEACHING needs (suggstion: find a
way to utlilize the ENTIRE week (5 days) and ENTIRE DAYS (morning
classes before 10)....
your Achim
 

"Thoughts without content are empty, intuitions without concepts are
blind."
Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, "Transcendental Logic,"
Introduction, # 1 
Dr. Achim D. Koeddermann
Associate Prof. of Philosophy
SUNY-Oneonta, NY 13820
"Gedanken ohne Inhalt sind leer, Anschauungen ohne Begriffe sind blind"



-----Original Message-----
From: Teaching Breakfast List on behalf of [log in to unmask]
Sent: Fri 11/5/2004 8:32 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: REGlobalized Teaching Breakfast
 
Hi Achim,
 
Like so many things in the world, Globalization can be both good or bad,
depending on what it means (thanks Janet) and how it is done.  If one
sees it as the greater awareness of living in a single world, I believe
it is good (although can still be used in bad ways); if one sees it as
the expansion of McDonalds all over the world, some greater discussion
might take place, but I would see this as bad.  
 
Bob

________________________________

From: Teaching Breakfast List on behalf of Achim Koeddermann
Sent: Thu 11/4/2004 9:57 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: REGlobalized Teaching Breakfast



Dear
 
intersting topic for a meeting  - and I wondered STILL going to my
class: is globalization a GOOD or a BAD thing?  What became of the
meeting?
PS: I did't get a chancer: does this group play a role in the Teaching
celebration next week? It should, it has been best in keeping ME
informed
your Achim