We should all be concerned. Increased control and uniformity over higher education by the federal government will likely lead to increased mediocrity and higher cost. The students will suffer. The faculty will become disenchanted. Society will be ill served. Can the United States afford for the federal government to affect colleges and universities as they have K-12 schools? Alfred Lubell ________________________________ From: Teaching Breakfast List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jim Greenberg Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 8:07 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: FW: Commission on the Future of Higher Education Tbers, I am very concerned about the framing of the future of higher education being put forward by the new federal Commission on the Future of Higher Education. It seems to me that this is a continuing attempt to corporatize education, or to make it subservient to corporate interests. I think we will see more and more of this as corporatist government becomes stronger and more hegemonic. More on "The Future" 1. Collaboration, one of the skills listed at the end, is contradicted in the first sentence were the goal is to compete. The first sentence in the third paragraph elaborates upon that goal..."to win that battle." 2. Sustainability, a nice skill/goal is built upon the model of American consumerism. 3. Passionate Personalizer is built upon the myth of hard work and dedication will get you success. American individualism, not democratic community building. The New York Times as the purveyor of the vision of the future of higher education in America? Rick Uttich <http://chronicle.com/> <http://chronicle.com/> http://chronicle.com/daily/2006/07/2006071203n.htm ________________________________ Wednesday, July 12, 2006 Rethink Higher Education for a Changing World, Best-Selling Author Tells Conference-Goers By JEFFREY SELINGO <mailto:[log in to unmask]> <mailto:[log in to unmask]> Honolulu Colleges need to refocus their missions in order to help American students compete in a global economy, Thomas L. Friedman, the best-selling author and New York Times columnist, told a standing-room-only crowd of university officials at the "Campus of the Future" meeting here this week. Mr. Friedman, the author of The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century, entertained the audience of more than 4,000 during an hour-long speech with anecdotes from the reporting of his book and personal stories about his own encounters with globalization. Speaking without notes, he told the joint meeting of three higher-education associations that China and India will challenge the role of the United States as a superpower in the 21st century, and that the United States will "not win by default." Regarding America's ability to win that battle, Mr. Friedman said he is much more optimistic now than he was when he finished his book, in late 2004. Since then, he said, he has traveled throughout the country and realized that America's entrepreneurial spirit and political and economic system confer a big advantage. Unlike China, he said, the United States doesn't "censor Google." Still, he warned, if the United States is to succeed in maintaining its economic dominance in the world, the country's education system needs to improve and change. "We don't just need more education, we need the right kind of education," he told the audience, representing the Association of Higher Education Facilities Officers, the National Association of College and University Business Officers, and the Society for College and University Planning. He urged educators to focus less on concrete outcomes like grades and test scores and more on teaching students how to learn, instilling passion and curiosity in them, and developing their intuitive skills. He compared educating students for an uncertain future to "training for the Olympics without knowing which sport you will compete in." Less and less, he said, universities should be training students for specific jobs -- many of which could be outsourced in the future -- and instead should focus on eight skills he identified as essential for the middle-class jobs of the future. Commenting on those skills, he said that students will need to be synthesizers, explainers, and adaptors, as well as leveragers, who can figure out how one person can do the job of 20, and localizers, who can discover local angles to global businesses. They must also have skills as collaborators and passionate personalizers, he said, and as developers of "green," or environmentally sustainable, enterprises. He illustrated collaboration by describing a trip to India where he was asked by the president of a high-tech company to meet with some of its interns. Sure, he said, "I'd love to meet with your Indian interns," only to be corrected by the president, who said they were the company's American interns. The company had 9,000 international applications for internships. Engineering and business students, in particular, he said, have discovered that one way to get ahead is to have experience in places like India and China. As an example of a passionate personalizer, he told the story of a lemonade vendor at Camden Yards, the home of the Baltimore Orioles, who not only sells lemonade, but does it with a sideshow. "At the end of the day, he has a stack of bills in tips greater than anyone else in the ballpark," Mr. Friedman said. Now the vendor has been hired out for parties. And sustainability, he said, will be increasingly important as China and India enter the playing field "and get the cars, homes, and refrigerators that Americans have." Any business that focuses on sustaining the world, he said, is going to work. See also the following related article: The University As Economic Savior http://chronicle.com/weekly/v52/i45/45a01801.htm Copyright <http://chronicle.com/help/copyright.htm> <http://chronicle.com/help/copyright.htm> (c) 2006 by The Chronicle of Higher Education <http://chronicle.com/> <http://chronicle.com/> Posted to Teaching Breakfast list with permission.