Hi everyone:  I AM on the TB mailing list, and follow much of the dialog with interest.
 
I am aware of some of the research on learning styles.
 
Jack sees a faucet.
Jill hears a voice say "faucet."
 
The next day, Jack and Jill are asked what  object they were exposed to.
 
After seeing the picture of a faucet, Jack may clearly remember what the faucet looked like because Jack is an unusually good learner of visual information.  And after hearing a voice say "faucet," Jill may clearly remember what the voice sounded like because Jill is an unusually good learner of auditory information. But if the task is to remember what object they had been exposed to -- a question of meaning -- Jack and Jill are likely to do equally well at remembering that it was a faucet.  So... People do differ in their ability to make and remember visual discriminations, and to make and remember auditory discriminations.  Concomitantly, they differ in how happy and comfortable they are, and how efficacious they feel when information is presented to them visually or through speech. But these individual differences do not result in differential learning of meaning, when information is presented visually vs. in spoken form. 
 
It's terrible when an idea that is sensible, coherent, believable, compelling, 
well-formed, and nicely matches our preconceived ideas, turns out to be empirically false.  That seems to be the case with the learning styles hypothesis.
 
Steve.
 
 
 
 
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Steven J. Gilbert, Ph.D.
   Professor Emeritus of Psychology
      State University of New York, College at Oneonta
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Teaching Breakfast List [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Conway, Paul ([log in to unmask])
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 1:53 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Learning Styles

Jim -
 
Is Steve Gilbert on the TB mailing list? It would be interesting to get his take on the study cited with Rick's article that debunks the concept of learning styles. For years students told me that their learning styles were based more on visual cues than listening and taking notes; I was always skeptical!
Cheers,
Paul
 
 
Paul Conway
1 College Park Drive
Oneonta, NY 13820
607-432-6988

From: Teaching Breakfast List [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Greenberg, Jim
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 1:32 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Learning Styles

Rick, 

My friends in Education and Educational Psychology have been very patient over my 31 years here trying to move me in more constructive directions when it comes to teaching and learning.  Those of us not in these fields often get caught up in the popular media constructed debate on how to "fix" education.  Technology! Problem Based Learning!  Student Centered Learning!  have all been recent mantras.  If only learning was that simple.  

Mr. James B. Greenberg 
Director Teaching, Learning and Technology Center 
Milne Library 
SUNY College at Oneonta 
Oneonta, New York 13820 

phone: 607-436-2701 
fax:   607-436-3677
Twitter: greenbjb

"Ignorance is curable, stupidity lasts forever"                                

 

 


From: "Jagels, Fredric ([log in to unmask])" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Teaching List <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:24:06 -0500
To: Teaching List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Learning Styles

Today’s breakfast discussion touched briefly on “learning Styles”.  Since it is such an appealing concept I thought this contrary-view short article would fuel some flames:
 
The referenced study is linked below:
 
 
 
 
 
Rick Jagels
Education Specialist
College Assistance Migrant Program
111 Wilsbach Hall
State University of NY College at Oneonta
(607)436-2297
[log in to unmask]